The tax liberalization introduced by the Law of Ukraine No. Though these changes predominantly addressed the existing economic challenges when they were adopted in March 2022, it became apparent over time that tax incentives significantly reduce budget revenues and often are not a decisive factor for the survival of enterprises. Legislative acts (LAs) in the field of tax regulation were primarily aimed at reducing taxes and, accordingly, supporting business activities and mitigating the shock of the full-scale invasion. Further details on each of these areas are provided below. We categorized all responses according to the main areas of impact: taxes, the military sphere, business regulations, centralization of governmental powers, access to information, and education. Regulations that need to be introduced.Effective regulations whose implementation should continue after the repeal of the martial law regime.Effective regulations that should be abolished after the end of the martial law regime.Ineffective regulations that need to be repealed immediately.Respondents were asked to identify LAs that, in their opinion, could be characterized as follows: To assess the legislation introduced after the full-scale invasion, we conducted a survey among our experts and civil society organizations (both in-person and through Google Forms). The methodology for identifying harmful legislative acts (LAs) However, some regulations that were adopted quickly, without considering the long-term consequences, have proven to be harmful to the country’s economy or have had only short-term positive effects. These funds are to be directed toward enhancing defense capabilities and the recovery of Ukraine. Additionally, a new type of sanction was introduced – the confiscation of assets of sanctioned individuals for the benefit of the state. This included the direct imposition of martial law and its subsequent extensions, imposing sanctions against individuals and entities from Russia as well as those supporting or aiding the aggressor in the war against Ukraine, banning activities of pro-Russian NGOs and Russian symbols, the potential restriction of actions of political parties that justify or deny Russian aggression, and the introduction of criminal liability for collaborationism, with increased penalties for crimes against the foundations of national security during martial law. The country’s situation during the full-scale war required lawmakers and the government to implement appropriate measures. Positive steps were taken in the deregulation of businesses (such as reducing the number of fire inspections and improving regulations regarding subsoil use), modernizing legislation (including the recognition of concepts like “freelancing” and “mobbing” in labor law, prohibiting discriminatory job descriptions, and enacting a new law on official statistics), and continuing reforms in various sectors including finance, healthcare, energy, and others. Additionally, cooperation with the EU in the field of transportation has deepened, including signing an agreement on freight transport by road, establishing a common aviation area, and implementing amendments to laws to ensure the functioning of the “customs-free” regime. For example, last year, laws such as “ On Media ,” “ On National Minorities (Communities) of Ukraine ,” and the Istanbul Convention were adopted and ratified. Some LAs were not directly related to martial law but focused on harmonizing Ukraine’s legislation with EU norms and fulfilling the conditions for EU membership. The majority of these regulations have been effective and successful. They aimed to support the Ukrainian economy, establish alternative paths of external trade, impose sanctions on Russia, and enhance Ukraine’s defense capabilities. Since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022, over 3,000 regulations have been introduced in Ukraine. The list of regulations that are harmful to the economy and require repeal, as mentioned in this article, is not exhaustive, so we would appreciate your insights and thoughts after the article’s publication. In this article, we present the generalized opinion of the experts we surveyed and the results of our research on legislation. As part of the research, we surveyed experts in various fields, as well as civil society organizations, regarding harmful regulations introduced during martial law in their respective areas of expertise. This study was conducted as part of the “ Monitoring Wartime Legislation and Progress Towards Democratic Reform ” project implemented with the support of NED.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |